Riley Carter

Dallas Employment Trial Lawyer Riley Carter

Most employees sign a proprietary information or trade secret agreement on their first day, somewhere in a stack of onboarding paperwork handed over between the tax forms and the direct deposit authorization. Very few employees read it closely, and almost no one keeps a copy. The document usually resurfaces only at the moment it matters most, when the employee has accepted a new position and the former employer sends a letter reminding them of “continuing obligations.” Understanding what these agreements actually require, and what they cannot lawfully require, is essential for any employee considering a move.

These agreements travel under a variety of names, including confidentiality agreement, nondisclosure agreement, proprietary information and inventions agreement, or employee agreement regarding confidential information. The label matters far less than the contents. A single document may contain several distinct promises, including a duty not to disclose or use confidential information, an assignment of inventions and work product to the employer, a promise to return all company property and delete company data, a promise not to solicit customers or clients, a promise not to recruit former coworkers, a covenant not to compete, a notice period before resignation, and a forfeiture or clawback provision affecting bonuses, commissions, or equity. Each of these operates differently, and each carries a different level of enforceability under Texas law.

Rachel-Bethel-200x300

Rachel Bethel Dallas
Trial Attorney

If you’ve started a new job recently, chances are that you signed some documents that you didn’t fully read. Somewhere in that stack of onboarding papers, there may have been a mandatory arbitration agreement.

And let me guess. No one at HR sat you down and explained what this clause actually means, right? That’s not by accident. It’s by design.

Cassidy Monska

Dallas Employment Trial Lawyer Cassidy Monska

Scroll through social media long enough and you will find someone telling a stranger to “sue” over almost anything. A canceled flight. A rude cashier. A manager who raised their voice. Everyone in the comment section is suddenly a lawyer.

Here is the problem with that: the “sue them” culture makes it harder to spot the situations that actually do matter. People who have been through real discrimination or retaliation start to wonder if their situation is “serious enough,” and they wait, and they lose time they cannot get back. Employment claims often move on short deadlines, so the cost of waiting can be the whole case.

Riley Carter

Dallas Employment Trial Lawyer Riley Carter

One of the most frustrating defenses in employment litigation is the corporate shrug. Ask why an employee was fired, and no one seems to know. The supervisor points to human resources. HR points to a manager who has since left. The manager points to a policy nobody can locate. The company insists that the decision was legitimate while making sure that no single witness will own it.

Rule 30(b)(6) exists to end that game. It is, in my view, the single most powerful discovery tool available to an employee suing an employer, and defense counsel know it. Understanding how it works, and how to use it aggressively, often determines whether a case settles on favorable terms or drifts toward trial with a muddy record.

Mental health struggles do not clock out when you clock in. If stress or anxiety is affecting your ability to do your job, you may have more options than you think. Texas workers are protected under both federal and state law, and understanding these protections can make a real difference in your day to day work life.

Do Stress and Anxiety Qualify as Disabilities?

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, as amended (ADAAA), a condition qualifies as a disability if it “substantially limits one or more major life activities.” Anxiety disorders, including generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and PTSD, often meet this standard when they are diagnosed and documented by a healthcare provider. General workplace stress on its own usually does not qualify, but chronic stress tied to a diagnosed mental health condition can.

Rachel-Bethel-200x300

Rachel Bethel Dallas
Trial Attorney

If you’ve experienced discrimination, harassment, or retaliation at work in Texas, you’ve probably been advised to file a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) or the Texas Workforce Commission (“TWC”).

What you may not realize is that the timing of when you hire counsel may be just as important as filing the Charge itself.

Cassidy Monska

Dallas Employment Trial Lawyer Cassidy Monska

When a company fails to follow its own policies, the first reaction for many people is to assume they have a legal claim. It makes sense on the surface. The employer wrote down the rules. The employer broke those rules. Someone got hurt. But in the legal world, a policy violation on its own is rarely enough to win a lawsuit. To have a viable claim, the policy violation typically has to connect to an actual law that was broken.

Understanding this distinction is one of the most important things you can do before deciding whether to pursue legal action.

Deontae Wherry

Dallas Senior Trial Attorney Deontae Wherry

Every Fourth of July, we celebrate the words that launched a nation: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.” Fireworks light the sky, families gather, and we honor the idea that no person is born above another. But behind the barbecues and parades lies a promise that Americans are still working to keep. The declaration that all people are created equal was not a description of the world as it was in 1776. It was a goal, a challenge handed down to every generation that followed. Nowhere is that challenge more alive than in the American workplace.

This year marks a milestone: 250 years since the Declaration of Independence. As we celebrate this 250th anniversary, we are reminded that the fight the Founders began is not finished. The words on that parchment set a standard we are still reaching for, and every generation, including ours, is called to carry it forward.

I often hear people say things like, “My [insert relation] sued for this, and they won.” As a lawyer, my ears perk up because I think this means that I have some good case law to look at, or a different kind fact pattern to be on the look at for when selecting cases. However, I soon learned that when people say this to me, they’re usually referring to settlements. And I’m glad that the person was so happy with the outcome that they describe it as a win. But, I’m a lawyer and I’m going to be persnickety: a settlement is different than a verdict, although both bring closure, they’re very different. I’m not even saying one is better than the other. But, it’s an important distinction to make, especially when it comes to confidentiality concerns and how the resolution can be discussed with others.

This blog discusses the difference between a settlement and a verdict.

What is a Verdict?

Rachel-Bethel-200x300

Rachel Bethel Dallas
Trial Attorney

Most people understand that the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADAAA) protects employees with physical or mental disabilities. But many workers do not realize that the ADAAA also protects workers who are simply perceived as having a disability, even if they have no actual impairment at all. This is called the “regarded as” prong of disability coverage.

The ADAAA defines “disability” in three distinct ways. A worker is protected if they:

Contact Information